Monday, November 7, 2022

Blog Post 7

 In the article “Locating Freedom of Speech in an Era of Global White Nationalism,” the authors Vats and Dutta explore the double standard around freedom of speech and how it is being enforced differently across different groups. Vats and Dutta states, “they continue to produce a world in which freedom of expression trumps the rights of outsiders'' (Vats & Dutta, 159) which addresses the way in which there are multiple narratives around what free speech is and how it should be used. People use free speech as an excuse to say hateful things without consequences. 


In the article, I found it interesting that a lot of the people that opposed the restrictions of free speech argued that it's because it's a slippery slope but as the article pointed out, free speech has already been limited. The only difference between the restrictions being proposed and the ones the examples that were listed is who is being affected by the restriction or lack of restriction of free speech. One example I thought about while reading this article is the Florida law and bill known as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill that is trying to be passed, which restricts classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity. I found it interesting that the groups of people that support this bill, which restricts what teachers can talk about in their classroom, also seem to be strong supporters of freedom of speech when it comes to hate speech. 



Anjali Vats & Mohan J. Dutta (2020) Locating freedom of speech in an era of global white nationalism, First Amendment Studies, 54:2, 156-180, DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2020.1838843


1 comment:

  1. I liked what you said about the double standard when it comes to discussing the freedom of speech and expression. Specifically how there are multiple narratives to what the definition of "free speech" really is. That is something that I thought about too while reading, but it seems like in the last few years, a lot of people in the United States have tried to excuse hate speech because they think that it is protected by the constitution, but should it be?

    ReplyDelete

Blog Post 10 - 12/6

Arnett et al, discusses the modern state of communication ethics and pragmatism. Much like many of our discussions this semester, the piece ...